linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] lkdtm: Make lkdtm_do_action() return to avoid tail call optimization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <170597418226.1430560.6759248448466704119.b4-ty@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:43:04 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lkdtm: Make lkdtm_do_action() return to avoid tail call optimization

On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:49:34 -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The comments for lkdtm_do_action() explicitly call out that it
> shouldn't be inlined because we want it to show up in stack
> crawls. However, at least with some compilers / options it's still
> vanishing due to tail call optimization. Let's add a return value to
> the function to make it harder for the compiler to do tail call
> optimization here.
> 
> [...]

Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks!

[1/2] lkdtm: Make lkdtm_do_action() return to avoid tail call optimization
      https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/189a4edb774b
[2/2] lkdtm/bugs: Adjust lkdtm_HUNG_TASK() to avoid tail call optimization
      https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/edb6538da3df

Take care,

-- 
Kees Cook