[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <vwhypt7y4j55kdpxs2u5nltcpseoz2jgs46d7cbqfef5sfi574@t3etq66zf6qe>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:50:57 -0500
From: Aren <aren@...cevolution.org>
To: Ondřej Jirman <megi@....cz>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@...il.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/3] power: supply: axp20x_usb_power: add input
current limit
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:38:54PM +0100, Ondřej Jirman wrote:
> Hello Aren,
>
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 08:40:00PM -0500, Aren Moynihan wrote:
> > Add properties for setting the maximum current that will be drawn from
> > the usb connection.
> >
> > These changes don't apply to all axp20x chips, so we need to add new
> > power_desc and power supply property objects for axp813 specifically.
> > These are copied from the axp22x variants that were used before, with
> > extra fields added.
> >
> > Also add a dev field to the axp20x_usb_power struct, so we can use
> > dev_dbg and dev_err in more places.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aren Moynihan <aren@...cevolution.org>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/power/supply/axp20x_usb_power.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/axp20x_usb_power.c b/drivers/power/supply/axp20x_usb_power.c
> > index e23308ad4cc7..8c0c2c25565f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/power/supply/axp20x_usb_power.c
> > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/axp20x_usb_power.c
> > @@ -50,7 +50,10 @@ struct axp_data {
> > const char * const *irq_names;
> > unsigned int num_irq_names;
> > const int *curr_lim_table;
> > + int input_curr_lim_table_size;
> > + const int *input_curr_lim_table;
> > struct reg_field curr_lim_fld;
> > + struct reg_field input_curr_lim_fld;
> > struct reg_field vbus_valid_bit;
> > struct reg_field vbus_mon_bit;
> > struct reg_field usb_bc_en_bit;
> > @@ -59,7 +62,9 @@ struct axp_data {
> > };
> >
> > struct axp20x_usb_power {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > struct regmap *regmap;
> > + struct regmap_field *input_curr_lim_fld;
> > struct regmap_field *curr_lim_fld;
> > struct regmap_field *vbus_valid_bit;
> > struct regmap_field *vbus_mon_bit;
> > @@ -115,6 +120,15 @@ static void axp20x_usb_power_poll_vbus(struct work_struct *work)
> > if (val != power->old_status)
> > power_supply_changed(power->supply);
> >
> > + if (power->usb_bc_en_bit && (val & AXP20X_PWR_STATUS_VBUS_PRESENT) !=
> > + (power->old_status & AXP20X_PWR_STATUS_VBUS_PRESENT)) {
> > + dev_dbg(power->dev, "Cable status changed, re-enabling USB BC");
> > + ret = regmap_field_write(power->usb_bc_en_bit, 1);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(power->dev, "failed to enable USB BC: errno %d",
> > + ret);
> > + }
> > +
> > power->old_status = val;
> > power->online = val & AXP20X_PWR_STATUS_VBUS_USED;
> >
> > @@ -123,6 +137,66 @@ static void axp20x_usb_power_poll_vbus(struct work_struct *work)
> > mod_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &power->vbus_detect, DEBOUNCE_TIME);
> > }
> >
> > +static int
> > +axp20x_usb_power_set_input_current_limit(struct axp20x_usb_power *power,
> > + int limit)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + unsigned int reg;
> > +
> > + if (!power->axp_data->input_curr_lim_table)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (limit < power->axp_data->input_curr_lim_table[0])
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> I think that you should just set the lowest possible limit. A caller (calling
> driver or userspace or user) has no way to identify what is the lowest possible
> limit on arbitrary PMIC and I kinda like having an option to
> echo 0 > .../axp20x-usb/input_current_limit as a way to limit power consumption from
> USB to a minimum without having to look up what actual minimum is in various
> PMICs dataheets.
>
> I looked through most of the uses of POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_INPUT_CURRENT_LIMIT in
> the upstream drivers and both approaches are used. Erroring out when out of range
> is less common.
That should be pretty easy, I love a good reason to delete code :)
Thanks
- Aren
> Otherwise,
>
> Reviewed-By: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
>
> Thank you,
> Ondrej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists