[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8075b1d2-1260-4f1d-a757-dc991d95710c@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:50:40 -0800
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Mrunal Patel <mpatel@...hat.com>,
Ryan Phillips <rphillips@...hat.com>, Brent Rowsell <browsell@...hat.com>,
Peter Hunt <pehunt@...hat.com>, Cestmir Kalina <ckalina@...hat.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Alex Gladkov <agladkov@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Costa Shulyupin <cshulyup@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: Support RCU_NOCB on isolated
partitions
On 1/22/24 10:07, Michal Koutný wrote:
> Hello Waiman.
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:35:03AM -0500, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>> This patch series is based on the RFC patch from Frederic [1]. Instead
>> of offering RCU_NOCB as a separate option, it is now lumped into a
>> root-only cpuset.cpus.isolation_full flag that will enable all the
>> additional CPU isolation capabilities available for isolated partitions
>> if set. RCU_NOCB is just the first one to this party. Additional dynamic
>> CPU isolation capabilities will be added in the future.
> IIUC this is similar to what I suggested back in the day and you didn't
> consider it [1]. Do I read this right that you've changed your mind?
I didn't said that we were not going to do this at the time. It's just
that more evaluation will need to be done before we are going to do
this. I was also looking to see if there were use cases where such
capabilities were needed. Now I am aware that such use cases do exist
and we should start looking into it.
>
> (It's fine if you did, I'm only asking to follow the heading of cpuset
> controller.)
OK, the title of the cover-letter may be too specific. I will make it
more general in the next version.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists