lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6fab57f0-13b5-455a-9109-1f9d475b7c3a@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 13:10:39 +0530
From: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
To: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@...look.com>, <agross@...nel.org>
CC: <andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5018-rdp432-c2: correct board name



On 1/22/2024 10:27 PM, Ziyang Huang wrote:
> 在 2024/1/23 0:03, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy 写道:
>>
>>
>> On 1/21/2024 6:22 PM, Ziyang Huang wrote:
>>> According to Qualcomm document:
>>>    MP03.1 is RDP404
>>>    RDP432 is MP03.5
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@...look.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018-rdp432-c2.dts | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018-rdp432-c2.dts 
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018-rdp432-c2.dts
>>> index 074b78d7939c..f7e8b5af6b44 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018-rdp432-c2.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018-rdp432-c2.dts
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>>   // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause
>>>   /*
>>> - * IPQ5018 MP03.1-C2 board device tree source
>>> + * IPQ5018 MP03.5-C2 board device tree source
>>
>>
>> I suggest to use the RDP number itself here...
> 
> Here is an embarrassing thing. AP/MPxx.x name is more common in the 
> entire QSDK while RDP number is almost never appeared.


That was the case but not anymore. We decided to switch to RDP number 
instead of AP/XXXX.. So it would better if we stick with RDP number for 
consistency.

> 
>>
>>
>>>    *
>>>    * Copyright (c) 2023 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>>>    */
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ