linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] selftests/mm: hugepage-shm: conform test to TAP format output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <965acceb-9aa1-473f-a873-40eaaebe5d0c@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 12:52:20 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] selftests/mm: hugepage-shm: conform test to TAP
 format output

Hi Andrew,

There hasn't been any comment on these. I guess, they can be picked up now?

Thanks,

On 1/15/24 12:32 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
> Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
> functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages.
> 
> The "." was being printed inside for loop to indicate the writes
> progress. This was extraneous and hence removed in the patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-shm.c | 47 +++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-shm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-shm.c
> index 478bb1e989e9..f949dbbc3454 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-shm.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-shm.c
> @@ -34,11 +34,10 @@
>  #include <sys/ipc.h>
>  #include <sys/shm.h>
>  #include <sys/mman.h>
> +#include "../kselftest.h"
>  
>  #define LENGTH (256UL*1024*1024)
>  
> -#define dprintf(x)  printf(x)
> -
>  /* Only ia64 requires this */
>  #ifdef __ia64__
>  #define ADDR (void *)(0x8000000000000000UL)
> @@ -54,44 +53,42 @@ int main(void)
>  	unsigned long i;
>  	char *shmaddr;
>  
> +	ksft_print_header();
> +	ksft_set_plan(1);
> +
>  	shmid = shmget(2, LENGTH, SHM_HUGETLB | IPC_CREAT | SHM_R | SHM_W);
> -	if (shmid < 0) {
> -		perror("shmget");
> -		exit(1);
> -	}
> -	printf("shmid: 0x%x\n", shmid);
> +	if (shmid < 0)
> +		ksft_exit_fail_msg("shmget: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +
> +	ksft_print_msg("shmid: 0x%x\n", shmid);
>  
>  	shmaddr = shmat(shmid, ADDR, SHMAT_FLAGS);
>  	if (shmaddr == (char *)-1) {
> -		perror("Shared memory attach failure");
>  		shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> -		exit(2);
> +		ksft_exit_fail_msg("Shared memory attach failure: %s\n", strerror(errno));
>  	}
> -	printf("shmaddr: %p\n", shmaddr);
>  
> -	dprintf("Starting the writes:\n");
> -	for (i = 0; i < LENGTH; i++) {
> +	ksft_print_msg("shmaddr: %p\n", shmaddr);
> +
> +	ksft_print_msg("Starting the writes:");
> +	for (i = 0; i < LENGTH; i++)
>  		shmaddr[i] = (char)(i);
> -		if (!(i % (1024 * 1024)))
> -			dprintf(".");
> -	}
> -	dprintf("\n");
> +	ksft_print_msg("Done.\n");
>  
> -	dprintf("Starting the Check...");
> +	ksft_print_msg("Starting the Check...");
>  	for (i = 0; i < LENGTH; i++)
> -		if (shmaddr[i] != (char)i) {
> -			printf("\nIndex %lu mismatched\n", i);
> -			exit(3);
> -		}
> -	dprintf("Done.\n");
> +		if (shmaddr[i] != (char)i)
> +			ksft_exit_fail_msg("\nIndex %lu mismatched\n", i);
> +	ksft_print_msg("Done.\n");
>  
>  	if (shmdt((const void *)shmaddr) != 0) {
> -		perror("Detach failure");
>  		shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
> -		exit(4);
> +		ksft_exit_fail_msg("Detach failure: %s\n", strerror(errno));
>  	}
>  
>  	shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	ksft_test_result_pass("Completed test\n");
> +
> +	ksft_finished();
>  }

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum