linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/2] selftests/bpf: Skip callback tests if jit is disabled in test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:03:51 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com>,
	Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/2] selftests/bpf: Skip callback tests if jit is disabled in test_verifier

If CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set and bpf_jit_enable is 0, there
exist 6 failed tests.

  [root@...ux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
  [root@...ux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled
  [root@...ux bpf]# ./test_verifier | grep FAIL
  #106/p inline simple bpf_loop call FAIL
  #107/p don't inline bpf_loop call, flags non-zero FAIL
  #108/p don't inline bpf_loop call, callback non-constant FAIL
  #109/p bpf_loop_inline and a dead func FAIL
  #110/p bpf_loop_inline stack locations for loop vars FAIL
  #111/p inline bpf_loop call in a big program FAIL
  Summary: 768 PASSED, 15 SKIPPED, 6 FAILED

The test log shows that callbacks are not allowed in non-JITed programs,
interpreter doesn't support them yet, thus these tests should be skipped
if jit is disabled.

Add an explicit flag F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED to those tests to mark that they
require JIT enabled in bpf_loop_inline.c, check the flag and jit_disabled
at the beginning of do_test_single() to handle this case.

With this patch:

  [root@...ux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
  [root@...ux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled
  [root@...ux bpf]# ./test_verifier | grep FAIL
  Summary: 768 PASSED, 21 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c           | 11 +++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c  |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 1a09fc34d093..c65915188d7c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
 
 #define F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS	(1 << 0)
 #define F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT		(1 << 1)
+#define F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED			(1 << 2)
 
 /* need CAP_BPF, CAP_NET_ADMIN, CAP_PERFMON to load progs */
 #define ADMIN_CAPS (1ULL << CAP_NET_ADMIN |	\
@@ -74,6 +75,7 @@
 		    1ULL << CAP_BPF)
 #define UNPRIV_SYSCTL "kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled"
 static bool unpriv_disabled = false;
+static bool jit_disabled;
 static int skips;
 static bool verbose = false;
 static int verif_log_level = 0;
@@ -1524,6 +1526,13 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
 	__u32 pflags;
 	int i, err;
 
+	if ((test->flags & F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED) && jit_disabled) {
+		printf("SKIP (callbacks are not allowed in non-JITed programs)\n");
+		skips++;
+		sched_yield();
+		return;
+	}
+
 	fd_prog = -1;
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++)
 		map_fds[i] = -1;
@@ -1844,6 +1853,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		return EXIT_FAILURE;
 	}
 
+	jit_disabled = !is_jit_enabled();
+
 	/* Use libbpf 1.0 API mode */
 	libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL);
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
index a535d41dc20d..59125b22ae39 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
 	.expected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() },
 	.unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.runs = 0,
 	.func_info = { { 0, MAIN_TYPE }, { 12, CALLBACK_TYPE } },
@@ -90,6 +91,7 @@
 	.expected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
 	.unexpected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() },
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.runs = 0,
 	.func_info = { { 0, MAIN_TYPE }, { 16, CALLBACK_TYPE } },
@@ -127,6 +129,7 @@
 	.expected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
 	.unexpected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() },
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.runs = 0,
 	.func_info = {
@@ -165,6 +168,7 @@
 	.expected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() },
 	.unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.runs = 0,
 	.func_info = {
@@ -235,6 +239,7 @@
 	},
 	.unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED,
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.func_info = {
 		{ 0, MAIN_TYPE },
@@ -252,6 +257,7 @@
 	.unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
+	.flags = F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED,
 	.func_info = { { 0, MAIN_TYPE }, { 16, CALLBACK_TYPE } },
 	.func_info_cnt = 2,
 	BTF_TYPES
-- 
2.42.0