linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix zoned block device information initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cedb4875-5795-4789-a010-a9c66fa61707@oppo.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:18:57 +0800
From: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng1@...o.com>
To: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@...il.com>, jaegeuk@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org,
 linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hustqwj@...t.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix zoned block device information
 initialization

Hi Wenjie,
It seems more reasonable to use bdev_max_open_zones instead of 
bdev_max_active_zones.

If an NVMe device has multiple namespaces, and the device contains a 
total of 11 open zones, two of the namespaces, nvme0n1 and nvme0n2, each 
correspond to an instance of the F2FS filesystem, and both filesystem 
instances can be initialized successfully. Since multiple namespaces 
share all open zones, the number of open zones is not equal to the 
number of open zones available to F2FS in a multi-namespace scenario. 
This patch does not yet cover this scenario.

On 1/23/2024 4:12 PM, Wenjie Qi wrote:
> If the max active zones of zoned devices are less than
> the active logs of F2FS, the device may error due to
> insufficient zone resources when multiple active logs are
> being written at the same time. If this value is 0, there is no limit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@...il.com>
> ---
>   fs/f2fs/f2fs.h  |  1 +
>   fs/f2fs/super.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 65294e3b0bef..669f84f6b0e5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1551,6 +1551,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>   	unsigned int blocks_per_blkz;		/* F2FS blocks per zone */
> +	unsigned int max_active_zones;		/* max zone resources of the zoned device */
>   #endif
>   
>   	/* for node-related operations */
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 206d03c82d96..aef41b54098c 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -2385,6 +2385,16 @@ static int f2fs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
>   	if (err)
>   		goto restore_opts;
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
> +	if (sbi->max_active_zones && sbi->max_active_zones < F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs) {
> +		f2fs_err(sbi,
> +			"zoned: max active zones %u is too small, need at least %u active zones",
> +				 sbi->max_active_zones, F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs);
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto restore_opts;
> +	}
> +#endif
> +
>   	/* flush outstanding errors before changing fs state */
>   	flush_work(&sbi->s_error_work);
>   
> @@ -3932,6 +3942,14 @@ static int init_blkz_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int devi)
>   	if (!f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi))
>   		return 0;
>   
> +	sbi->max_active_zones = bdev_max_active_zones(bdev);
> +	if (sbi->max_active_zones && sbi->max_active_zones < F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs) {
> +		f2fs_err(sbi,
> +			"zoned: max active zones %u is too small, need at least %u active zones",
> +				 sbi->max_active_zones, F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>   	zone_sectors = bdev_zone_sectors(bdev);
>   	if (!is_power_of_2(zone_sectors)) {
>   		f2fs_err(sbi, "F2FS does not support non power of 2 zone sizes\n");