linux-kernel - RE: [HID Patchsets for Samsung driver v2 2/6] HID: Samsung : Fix the checkpatch complain.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:34:26 +0530
From: "sandeep.cs" <sandeep.cs@...sung.com>
To: "'Jiri Kosina'" <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: "'Joe Perches'" <joe@...ches.com>, "'Benjamin Tissoires'"
	<benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>, <gaudium.lee@...sung.com>,
	<ih0923.kim@...sung.com>, <suhyun_.kim@...sung.com>,
	<jitender.s21@...sung.com>, <junwan.cho@...sung.com>,
	<linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [HID Patchsets for Samsung driver v2 2/6] HID: Samsung : Fix
 the checkpatch complain.

>> >> -	} else
>> >> -	if (*rsize == 203 && rdesc[192] == 0x15 && rdesc[193] == 0x0 &&
>> >> +	} else if (*rsize == 203 && rdesc[192] == 0x15 && rdesc[193] ==
>> >> +0x0 &&
>> >>  			rdesc[194] == 0x25 && rdesc[195] == 0x12) {
>> >>  		samsung_irda_dev_trace(hdev, 203);
>> >>  		rdesc[193] = 0x1;
>> >>  		rdesc[195] = 0xf;
>> >> -	} else
>> >> -	if (*rsize == 135 && rdesc[124] == 0x15 && rdesc[125] == 0x0 &&
>> >> +	} else if (*rsize == 135 && rdesc[124] == 0x15 && rdesc[125] ==
>> >> +0x0 &&
>> >>  			rdesc[126] == 0x25 && rdesc[127] == 0x11) {
>> >>  		samsung_irda_dev_trace(hdev, 135);
>> >>  		rdesc[125] = 0x1;
>> >>  		rdesc[127] = 0xe;
>> >> -	} else
>> >> -	if (*rsize == 171 && rdesc[160] == 0x15 && rdesc[161] == 0x0 &&
>> >> +	} else if (*rsize == 171 && rdesc[160] == 0x15 && rdesc[161] ==
>> >> +0x0 &&
>> >>  			rdesc[162] == 0x25 && rdesc[163] == 0x01) {
>> >>  		samsung_irda_dev_trace(hdev, 171);
>> >>  		rdesc[161] = 0x1;
>> >
>> >For this block, I think a rewrite using memcmp would be clearer.
>> >Something like:
>> Okay . Thanks for your valuable feedback. We will promptly address
>> your suggestions and enhance our code accordingly.
>
>I agree with Joe's suggestion here; are you planning to send v2 of the
series?
>
>The rest of the set looks good to me.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--
>Jiri Kosina
>SUSE Labs

Hello Jiri ,

Yes, I am planning to send the v2 of the series. I will include review
comments and share it with you soon.

Thank & Regards
Sandeep C S