linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] clk: qcom: Add dispcc clock driver for x1e80100

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Za+jSGEpa6sobVIU@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 13:30:16 +0200
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] clk: qcom: Add dispcc clock driver for x1e80100

On 23-12-15 12:45:11, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 14/12/2023 16:49, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > From: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
> > 
> > Add the dispcc clock driver for x1e80100.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> > ---
> 
> > +static struct platform_driver disp_cc_x1e80100_driver = {
> > +	.probe = disp_cc_x1e80100_probe,
> > +	.driver = {
> > +		.name = "disp_cc-x1e80100",
> > +		.of_match_table = disp_cc_x1e80100_match_table,
> > +	},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __init disp_cc_x1e80100_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	return platform_driver_register(&disp_cc_x1e80100_driver);
> > +}
> > +subsys_initcall(disp_cc_x1e80100_init);
> > +
> > +static void __exit disp_cc_x1e80100_exit(void)
> > +{
> > +	platform_driver_unregister(&disp_cc_x1e80100_driver);
> > +}
> > +module_exit(disp_cc_x1e80100_exit);
> > +
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI DISPCC X1E80100 Driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > 
> 
> And we don't even do the odd underscore insertion consistently. For whatever
> reason "DISPCC" instead of "DISP_CC"
> 
> Just to reiterate the underscores should be dropped from these clock
> controller names and defines entirely, they just eat up bytes in databases.
> 
> .name = "dispcc-x1e80100"
> 
> ("QTI DISPCC X1E80100 Driver"); better but IMO we could just a complete word
> here
> 
> "Display Clock Controller" there's no need to abbreviate.

Maybe, but I think it's better to stay aligned with other platforms.
So please check SM8550, SM8650, and so on.

> 
> ---
> bod