linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/3] watchdog/softlockup: add parameter to control the reporting of time-consuming hardirq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240123121223.22318-4-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:12:23 +0800
From: Bitao Hu <yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: dianders@...omium.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	pmladek@...e.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de,
	maz@...nel.org,
	liusong@...ux.alibaba.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bitao Hu <yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] watchdog/softlockup: add parameter to control the reporting of time-consuming hardirq

To obtain a more accurate cause of softlockup, we use tracepoints to
measure the time of each hardirq, which may have some impact on
performance. A parameter could be added to allow users to enable
this feature on demand.

Signed-off-by: Bitao Hu <yaoma@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
 kernel/watchdog.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index f347c5d8c5c1..314dfd301d8c 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -303,6 +303,9 @@ unsigned int __read_mostly softlockup_panic =
 static bool softlockup_initialized __read_mostly;
 static u64 __read_mostly sample_period;
 
+static int __read_mostly softlockup_irqtrace;
+static bool softlockup_irqtrace_initialized __read_mostly;
+
 /* Timestamp taken after the last successful reschedule. */
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, watchdog_touch_ts);
 /* Timestamp of the last softlockup report. */
@@ -318,6 +321,13 @@ static int __init softlockup_panic_setup(char *str)
 }
 __setup("softlockup_panic=", softlockup_panic_setup);
 
+static int __init softlockup_irqtrace_setup(char *str)
+{
+	get_option(&str, &softlockup_irqtrace);
+	return 1;
+}
+__setup("softlockup_irqtrace=", softlockup_irqtrace_setup);
+
 static int __init nowatchdog_setup(char *str)
 {
 	watchdog_user_enabled = 0;
@@ -635,7 +645,7 @@ static void print_hardirq_time(void)
 	u64 start_time, now, a;
 	u32 period_us, i, b;
 
-	if (test_bit(SOFTLOCKUP_HARDIRQ, this_cpu_ptr(&softlockup_flags))) {
+	if (softlockup_irqtrace && test_bit(SOFTLOCKUP_HARDIRQ, this_cpu_ptr(&softlockup_flags))) {
 		start_time = __this_cpu_read(hardirq_start_time);
 		now = local_clock();
 		period_us = (now - start_time)/1000;
@@ -856,7 +866,10 @@ static void softlockup_stop_all(void)
 	if (!softlockup_initialized)
 		return;
 
-	unhook_hardirq_events();
+	if (softlockup_irqtrace_initialized) {
+		unhook_hardirq_events();
+		softlockup_irqtrace_initialized = false;
+	}
 
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, &watchdog_allowed_mask)
 		smp_call_on_cpu(cpu, softlockup_stop_fn, NULL, false);
@@ -874,7 +887,10 @@ static void softlockup_start_all(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
 
-	hook_hardirq_events();
+	if (softlockup_irqtrace && !softlockup_irqtrace_initialized) {
+		hook_hardirq_events();
+		softlockup_irqtrace_initialized = true;
+	}
 
 	cpumask_copy(&watchdog_allowed_mask, &watchdog_cpumask);
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, &watchdog_allowed_mask)
@@ -1090,6 +1106,26 @@ int proc_watchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 	return err;
 }
 
+/*
+ * /proc/sys/kernel/softlockup_irqtrace
+ */
+int proc_softlockup_irqtrace(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+			 void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	int err, old;
+
+	mutex_lock(&watchdog_mutex);
+
+	old = READ_ONCE(softlockup_irqtrace);
+	err = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+
+	if (!err && write && old != READ_ONCE(softlockup_irqtrace))
+		proc_watchdog_update();
+
+	mutex_unlock(&watchdog_mutex);
+	return err;
+}
+
 /*
  * The cpumask is the mask of possible cpus that the watchdog can run
  * on, not the mask of cpus it is actually running on.  This allows the
@@ -1158,6 +1194,15 @@ static struct ctl_table watchdog_sysctls[] = {
 		.extra1		= SYSCTL_ZERO,
 		.extra2		= SYSCTL_ONE,
 	},
+	{
+		.procname	= "softlockup_irqtrace",
+		.data		= &softlockup_irqtrace,
+		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
+		.mode		= 0644,
+		.proc_handler	= proc_softlockup_irqtrace,
+		.extra1		= SYSCTL_ZERO,
+		.extra2		= SYSCTL_ONE,
+	},
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	{
 		.procname	= "softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace",
-- 
2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)