[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdwwfTdYYG59DcwO=kPXmPxrkShk6VjoSQPHKDi_p=iMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:44:30 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Tom Joseph <tjoseph@...ence.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
gregory.clement@...tlin.com, theo.lebrun@...tlin.com,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, u-kumar1@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: move suspend/resume to suspend_noirq/resume_noirq
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 4:33 PM Thomas Richard
<thomas.richard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> On 1/19/24 17:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 6:08 PM Thomas Richard
> > <thomas.richard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >> On 1/15/24 21:02, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 6:16 PM Thomas Richard
> >>> <thomas.richard@...tlin.com> wrote:
..
> >>>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops pinctrl_single_pm_ops = {
> >>>> + SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pinctrl_single_suspend_noirq,
> >>>> + pinctrl_single_resume_noirq)
> >>>> +};
> >>>
> >>> Use proper / modern macro.
> >>
> >> fixed, use DEFINE_NOIRQ_DEV_PM_OPS now
> >
> > ...
> >
> >>>> #endif
> >>>
> >>> Why ifdeferry is needed (esp. taking into account pm_ptr() use below)?
> >>
> >> We may have an "unused variable" warning for pinctrl_single_pm_ops if
> >> CONFIG_PM is undefined (due to pm_ptr).
> >
> > This is coupled with the above. Fixing above will automatically make
> > the right thing.
>
> Yes you're right.
> By the way I can use pm_sleep_ptr instead of pm_ptr.
Yes, pm_sleep_ptr() is the correct one in this case.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists