[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240124164116.k5ah56xvuclfkxdr@despise>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:41:16 -0600
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
CC: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar
<ssantosh@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: configs: keystone: Remove this defconfig
On 10:28-20240124, Andrew Davis wrote:
> TI Keystone devices can and should use the common multi-v7 defconfig.
> Currently it is not clear which defconfig should be used and so config
> options for Keystone boards are added to either both defconfigs, or only
> one or the other. As nice as it is to have a config just for this platform
> it is a maintenance burden. As it is not used by generic distros it is not
> very useful to continue to maintain. Remove this defconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
> ---
> arch/arm/configs/keystone_defconfig | 238 ----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 238 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/keystone_defconfig
>
There are a bunch of downstream folks who will have recipe fails etc if
we do that. I am not sure we need to go down that route.
I know we had intent on multi_v7_defconfig -> but as far as I recollect,
at least during armv7 it did'nt exactly pan out as it did on armv8.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists