linux-kernel - Re: [6.8-rc1 Regression] Unable to exec apparmor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgJmDuYOQ+m_urRzrTTrQoobCJXnSYMovpwKckGgTyMxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:46:00 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Kevin Locke <kevin@...inlocke.name>, John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>, 
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>, 
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [6.8-rc1 Regression] Unable to exec apparmor_parser from virt-aa-helper

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 08:35, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Oh, yikes. This means the LSM lost the knowledge that this open is an
> _exec_, not a _read_.
>
> I will starting looking at this. John might be able to point me in the
> right direction more quickly, though.

One obvious change in -rc1 is that the exec open was moved much
earlier: commit 978ffcbf00d8 ("execve: open the executable file before
doing anything else").

If the code ends up deciding "is this an exec" based on some state
flag that hasn't been set, that would explain it.

Something like "current->in_execve", perhaps?

               Linus