linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-mcu/wakeup: Disable MCU and wakeup R5FSS nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240124172151.ngxaq6k5tnvsx4jr@proud>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:21:51 -0600
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
CC: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>,
        <kristo@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <bb@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <u-kumar1@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p-mcu/wakeup: Disable MCU and
 wakeup R5FSS nodes

On 11:26-20240124, Jayesh Choudhary wrote:
> Hello Vaishnav,
> 
> On 21/01/24 19:10, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
> > K3 Remoteproc R5 driver requires reserved memory carveouts and
> > mailbox configuration to instantiate the cores successfully.
> > Since this is a board level dependency, keep the R5 subsytem
> > disabled at SoC dtsi, otherwise it results in probe errors like
> > below during AM62P SK boot:
> > 
> > r5fss@...00000: reserved memory init failed, ret = -22
> > r5fss@...00000: k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = -22
> > r5fss@...00000: reserved memory init failed, ret = -22
> > r5fss@...00000: k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init failed, ret = -22
> > 
> > Fixes: b5080c7c1f7e ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p: Add nodes for more IPs")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@...com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@...com>
> 
> > ---
> >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi    | 2 ++
> >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi | 1 +
> >   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
> > index c4b0b91d70cf..14eb9ba836d3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-mcu.dtsi
> > @@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ mcu_r5fss0: r5fss@...00000 {
> >   		ranges = <0x79000000 0x00 0x79000000 0x8000>,
> >   			 <0x79020000 0x00 0x79020000 0x8000>;
> >   		power-domains = <&k3_pds 7 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> > +		status = "disabled";
> > +
> >   		mcu_r5fss0_core0: r5f@...00000 {
> >   			compatible = "ti,am62-r5f";
> >   			reg = <0x79000000 0x00008000>,
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
> > index 19f42b39394e..10a7059b2d9b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62p-wakeup.dtsi
> > @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ wkup_r5fss0: r5fss@...00000 {
> >   		ranges = <0x78000000 0x00 0x78000000 0x8000>,
> >   			 <0x78100000 0x00 0x78100000 0x8000>;
> >   		power-domains = <&k3_pds 119 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> > +		status = "disabled";

Is there a reason for difference in white space addition?

> >   		wkup_r5fss0_core0: r5f@...00000 {
> >   			compatible = "ti,am62-r5f";
> 
> Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D