linux-kernel - Re: 回复: [PATCH] mm/compaction: add check mechanism to avoid cma alloc fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZbFZh-E7BZEGm_Ed@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:40:07 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Haiqiang Gong (龚海强) <Haiqiang.Gong@...iatek.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Zhang (张伟伟) <Mike.Zhang@...iatek.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: 回复: [PATCH] mm/compaction:
 add check mechanism to avoid cma alloc fail

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 07:20:53AM +0000, Haiqiang Gong (龚海强) wrote:
> > I don't understand.  You say that the memory isn't movable, but then you 
> > say that it's migrated in.  So it was movable, but it's no longer
> > movable after being moved once?  
> Sorry for not expressing clearly
> When doing memory migration, the kernel will determine whether the current 
> page can be moved based on the refcount and mapcount of the current page.
> This memory can be moved during kernel compaction. At this time, refcount 
> is less than or equal to mapcount.
> After this memory is kcompacted and placed in the cma buffer, under 
> certain special conditions, the refcount may be greater than the mapcount
> （ex:the current page is being used by fs）, and then migrate will fail.

But that's always true.  Any page that is currently in use might have
its refcount temporarily incremented.  There's nothing special about
pages that belong to a file.  You've basically just prevented all
filesystem memory from being migrated to the CMA area, and that's wrong.

What's special about this page?  Or were you just unlucky?