[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZbFahHxi5laA6CbI@andrea>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:44:20 +0100
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
paulmck@...nel.org, corbet@....net, mmaas@...gle.com,
hboehm@...gle.com, striker@...ibm.com, charlie@...osinc.com,
rehn@...osinc.com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] membarrier: riscv: Provide core serializing
command
> > +# riscv uses xRET as return from interrupt and to return to user-space.
> > +#
> > +# Given that xRET is not core serializing, we rely on FENCE.I for providing
> > +# core serialization:
> > +#
> > +# - by calling sync_core_before_usermode() on return from interrupt (cf.
> > +# ipi_sync_core()),
> > +#
> > +# - via switch_mm() and sync_core_before_usermode() (respectively, for
> > +# uthread->uthread and kthread->uthread transitions) to go back to
> > +# user-space.
>
> I don't quite get the meaning of the sentence above. There seems to be a
> missing marker before "to go back".
Let's see. Without the round brackets, the last part becomes:
- via switch_mm() and sync_core_before_usermode() to go back to
user-space.
This is indeed what I meant to say. What am I missing?
Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists