[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240124233424.GLZbGegG_5eUaGBOlz@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:34:24 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, corbet@....net, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, paulmck@...nel.org,
rdunlap@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
yanjiewtw@...il.com, kim.phillips@....com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, jmattson@...gle.com, leitao@...ian.org,
jpoimboe@...nel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, jithu.joseph@...el.com,
kai.huang@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
sandipan.das@....com, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
peternewman@...gle.com, maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Fix unneeded variable warning reported by
kernel test robot
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 03:03:15PM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Since you are the one that decides the rules for inclusion you can make this
> check to be one where checkpatch.pl can be ignored. No objection from me if
> you choose to do so (and I will note the precedent for future patches).
Nah, that's not nearly as important for you to change your workflow.
What I'd suggest, though, is to sanity-check what checkpatch suggests and
ask yourself whether it always makes sense.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists