[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240124025947.2110659-8-nunes.erico@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 03:59:46 +0100
From: Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@...il.com>
To: Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>,
anarsoul@...il.com,
christian.koenig@....com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
lima@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/lima: increase default job timeout to 10s
The previous 500ms default timeout was fairly optimistic and could be
hit by real world applications. Many distributions targeting devices
with a Mali-4xx already bumped this timeout to a higher limit.
We can be generous here with a high value as 10s since this should
mostly catch buggy jobs like infinite loop shaders, and these don't
seem to happen very often in real applications.
Signed-off-by: Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@...il.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
index c2e78605e43e..00b19adfc888 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static void lima_sched_recover_work(struct work_struct *work)
int lima_sched_pipe_init(struct lima_sched_pipe *pipe, const char *name)
{
unsigned int timeout = lima_sched_timeout_ms > 0 ?
- lima_sched_timeout_ms : 500;
+ lima_sched_timeout_ms : 10000;
pipe->fence_context = dma_fence_context_alloc(1);
spin_lock_init(&pipe->fence_lock);
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists