[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGWkznEu5u1-MgK1XoexDkRetp34b_D1KvmDLfaOayY959BBOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:53:50 +0800
From: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
steve.kang@...soc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: introduce content activity based ioprio
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 9:06 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 05:33:52PM +0800, zhaoyang.huang wrote:
> > #define ALLOC_CACHE_MAX 256
> > @@ -1069,12 +1070,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_add_zone_append_page);
> > void __bio_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
> > unsigned int len, unsigned int off)
> > {
> > + int class, level, hint, activity;
> > +
> > + class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(bio->bi_ioprio);
> > + level = IOPRIO_PRIO_LEVEL(bio->bi_ioprio);
> > + hint = IOPRIO_PRIO_HINT(bio->bi_ioprio);
> > + activity = IOPRIO_PRIO_ACTIVITY(bio->bi_ioprio);
> > +
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED));
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_full(bio, len));
> >
> > bvec_set_page(&bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt], page, len, off);
> > bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
> > bio->bi_vcnt++;
> > + activity += (bio->bi_vcnt <= IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY && PageWorkingset(page)) ? 1 : 0;
>
> The block layer must not look at page bits. I've fixed all this crap
> with a lot of work and we're not going to re-add it for another qute
> hack. The place to figure out any kind of I/O priority is the file
> system (preferably using generic helpers).
ok, will use helper function in next version
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists