[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240124113841.31824-9-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:38:34 +0000
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk, kbusch@...nel.org, hch@....de, sagi@...mberg.me,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, djwong@...nel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, dchinner@...hat.com,
jack@...e.cz
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, jbongio@...gle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, ming.lei@...hat.com, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com,
bvanassche@....org, John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/15] block: Error an attempt to split an atomic write bio
As the name suggests, we should not be splitting these.
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
---
block/blk-merge.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index 6306a2c82354..9d714e8f76b3 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -314,6 +314,11 @@ struct bio *bio_split_rw(struct bio *bio, const struct queue_limits *lim,
*segs = nsegs;
return NULL;
split:
+ if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_ATOMIC) {
+ bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
+ bio_endio(bio);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ }
/*
* We can't sanely support splitting for a REQ_NOWAIT bio. End it
* with EAGAIN if splitting is required and return an error pointer.
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists