linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: fix W= flags in the help message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNATABD0S40dnGznQNmPYAi_i0eh2ftYQfBm98teG7QPd5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:59:11 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, 
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: fix W= flags in the help message

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:21 AM Nicolas Schier <n.schier@....de> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 05:32:55PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > W=c and W=e are supported.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >
> >  Makefile | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index f288eb2dc8fd..8c6a935c62e6 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -1653,7 +1653,7 @@ help:
> >       @echo  '                       (sparse by default)'
> >       @echo  '  make C=2   [targets] Force check of all c source with $$CHECK'
> >       @echo  '  make RECORDMCOUNT_WARN=1 [targets] Warn about ignored mcount sections'
> > -     @echo  '  make W=n   [targets] Enable extra build checks, n=1,2,3 where'
> > +     @echo  '  make W=n   [targets] Enable extra build checks, n=1,2,3,c,e where'
>
> In the top of scripts/Makefile.extrawarn we have kind of a duplication
> of this description.  Might you want to update that too?

W=e is already mentioned in scripts/Makefile.extrawarn.
W=c is handled in scripts/kconfig/Makefile.

So, I believe it is OK as-is.





> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada