linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3-of-simple: Stop using of_reset_control_array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024012441-gender-crock-016c@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:39:58 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3-of-simple: Stop using
 of_reset_control_array_get() directly

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 12:26:20PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Use of_reset_control_array_get_optional_exclusive() instead, it is
> implemented as:
> 
>   static inline struct reset_control *
>   of_reset_control_array_get_optional_exclusive(struct device_node *node)
>   {
>           return of_reset_control_array_get(node, false, true, true);
>   }
> 
> This makes the code easier to understand and removes the last remaining
> direct use of of_reset_control_array_get(). No functional changes.

Does this mean the function should be removed or made static now?

thanks,

greg k-h