[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o7da4zc1.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:48:14 +0100
From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@....org>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
Cc: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@...tec.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, NXP Linux
Team <linux-imx@....com>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Primoz Fiser
<primoz.fiser@...ik.com>, Christoph Stoidner <c.stoidner@...tec.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, upstream@...ts.phytec.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: imx93: Add phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93
support
Hello Stefan,
>> Defining line names should be fine. But I would still prefer to have
>> the muxing in an overlay bound to a specific use case.
> I'm fine with this. Unfortunately Mathieu dropped the line names in V5
> today :-(
>
> AFAIR reviewers should have 2 weeks time maximum. This was just 2 days.
I am sorry but it is not easy for me to deal with contradictory input. I
chose to remove the gpio-line-names even though it also seemed like a
nice addition to me. The idea was to not interfere with Phytec plans in
the future.
There is no hurry and I can always restore them in a v6.
Let me know what you think,
Thanks,
Mathieu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists