linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/3] selftests/seccomp: user_notification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240124141357.1243457-4-terry.tritton@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:13:57 +0000
From: Terry Tritton <terry.tritton@...aro.org>
To: keescook@...omium.org,
	luto@...capital.net,
	wad@...omium.org,
	shuah@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	peter.griffin@...aro.org,
	kernel-team@...roid.com,
	bettyzhou@...gle.com,
	Terry Tritton <terry.tritton@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] selftests/seccomp: user_notification_addfd check nextfd is available

Currently the user_notification_addfd test checks what the next expected
file descriptor will be by incrementing a variable nextfd. This does not
account for file descriptors that may already be open before the test is
started and will cause the test to fail if any exist.

Replace nextfd++ with a function get_next_fd which will check and return
the next available file descriptor.

Signed-off-by: Terry Tritton <terry.tritton@...aro.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 24 +++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index da11b95b8872..cacf6507f690 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -4044,6 +4044,16 @@ TEST(user_notification_filter_empty_threaded)
 	EXPECT_GT((pollfd.revents & POLLHUP) ?: 0, 0);
 }
 
+
+int get_next_fd(int prev_fd)
+{
+	for (int i = prev_fd + 1; i < FD_SETSIZE; ++i) {
+		if (fcntl(i, F_GETFD) == -1)
+			return i;
+	}
+	_exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+}
+
 TEST(user_notification_addfd)
 {
 	pid_t pid;
@@ -4060,7 +4070,7 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd)
 	/* There may be arbitrary already-open fds at test start. */
 	memfd = memfd_create("test", 0);
 	ASSERT_GE(memfd, 0);
-	nextfd = memfd + 1;
+	nextfd = get_next_fd(memfd);
 
 	ret = prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0);
 	ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) {
@@ -4071,7 +4081,8 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd)
 	/* Check that the basic notification machinery works */
 	listener = user_notif_syscall(__NR_getppid,
 				      SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER);
-	ASSERT_EQ(listener, nextfd++);
+	ASSERT_EQ(listener, nextfd);
+	nextfd = get_next_fd(nextfd);
 
 	pid = fork();
 	ASSERT_GE(pid, 0);
@@ -4126,14 +4137,16 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd)
 
 	/* Verify we can set an arbitrary remote fd */
 	fd = ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd);
-	EXPECT_EQ(fd, nextfd++);
+	EXPECT_EQ(fd, nextfd);
+	nextfd = get_next_fd(nextfd);
 	EXPECT_EQ(filecmp(getpid(), pid, memfd, fd), 0);
 
 	/* Verify we can set an arbitrary remote fd with large size */
 	memset(&big, 0x0, sizeof(big));
 	big.addfd = addfd;
 	fd = ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD_BIG, &big);
-	EXPECT_EQ(fd, nextfd++);
+	EXPECT_EQ(fd, nextfd);
+	nextfd = get_next_fd(nextfd);
 
 	/* Verify we can set a specific remote fd */
 	addfd.newfd = 42;
@@ -4171,7 +4184,8 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd)
 	 * Child has earlier "low" fds and now 42, so we expect the next
 	 * lowest available fd to be assigned here.
 	 */
-	EXPECT_EQ(fd, nextfd++);
+	EXPECT_EQ(fd, nextfd);
+	nextfd = get_next_fd(nextfd);
 	ASSERT_EQ(filecmp(getpid(), pid, memfd, fd), 0);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.43.0.429.g432eaa2c6b-goog