[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZbJ8gp47CWDDqCb4@a4bf019067fa.jf.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:21:38 -0800
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@...el.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Remove unnecessary ret init
Hi Ilpo
thanks for looking into it.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:03:28PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> ret variable is assigned unconditionally in ifs_load_firmware(), thus
> remove the unnecessary initialization of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c
> index a1ee1a74fc3c..03e49b836a6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c
> @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ int ifs_load_firmware(struct device *dev)
> unsigned int expected_size;
> const struct firmware *fw;
> char scan_path[64];
> - int ret = -EINVAL;
> + int ret;
>
Looks reasonable to me.
I can keep this as a separate cleanup patch, or merge the change in this
patch.
What ever Hans/You prefer.
Cheers,
Ashok
Powered by blists - more mailing lists