Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:30:45 +0000
From: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>, "x86@...nel.org"
	<x86@...nel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org"
	<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-sh@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "loongarch@...ts.linux.dev"
	<loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org"
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"hbathini@...ux.ibm.com" <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>, "piliu@...hat.com"
	<piliu@...hat.com>, "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH linux-next v3 06/14] x86, crash: wrap crash dumping code
 into crash related ifdefs

From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 1:17 AM
> 
> On 01/25/24 at 05:12am, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024
> 8:10 PM
> > >
> > > On 01/24/24 at 11:02pm, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > > index 01fa06dd06b6..f8163a59026b 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > > @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ static void hv_machine_shutdown(void)
> > > > >  		hyperv_cleanup();
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
> > > > >  static void hv_machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  	if (hv_crash_handler)
> > > > > @@ -221,6 +222,7 @@ static void hv_machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > > >  	/* Disable the hypercall page when there is only 1 active CPU. */
> > > > >  	hyperv_cleanup();
> > > > >  }
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > >  #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
> > > >
> > > > Note that the #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP is nested inside
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CODE here, and in the other Hyper-V code
> > > > just below.   It's also nested in xen_hvm_guest_init() at the bottom
> > > > of this patch.  But the KVM case of setting crash_shutdown is
> > > > not nested -- you changed #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE to #ifdef
> > > > CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP.
> > > >
> > > > I think both approaches work because CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP implies
> > > > CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE, but I wonder if it would be better to *not* nest
> > > > in all cases.  I'd like to see the cases be consistent so in the future
> > > > someone doesn't wonder why there's a difference (unless there's
> > > > a reason for the difference that I missed).
> > >
> > > I agree with you, it's a great suggestion. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Do you think below draft patch includes all changes you are concerned
> > > about?
> >
> > Yes, these changes look good as a delta to your original patch.
> >
> > But also look at xen_hvm_guest_init().  It looks like your original patch
> > does nesting there as well, and it could probably be "un-nested".
> 
> Right. I checked them all in arch/x86 this time, hope nothing is missed
> again. I can post a v4 to update this x86 patch later if no other
> concern. Thanks.

Yes -- everything looks good to me now.

Michael

> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> index f8163a59026b..2e8cd5a4ae85 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> @@ -209,6 +209,7 @@ static void hv_machine_shutdown(void)
>  	if (kexec_in_progress)
>  		hyperv_cleanup();
>  }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
>  static void hv_machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -222,8 +223,7 @@ static void hv_machine_crash_shutdown(struct
> pt_regs *regs)
>  	/* Disable the hypercall page when there is only 1 active CPU. */
>  	hyperv_cleanup();
>  }
> -#endif
> -#endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP */
>  #endif /* CONFIG_HYPERV */
> 
>  static uint32_t  __init ms_hyperv_platform(void)
> @@ -497,9 +497,11 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
>  	no_timer_check = 1;
>  #endif
> 
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) && defined(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)
>  	machine_ops.shutdown = hv_machine_shutdown;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
> +#endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP)
>  	machine_ops.crash_shutdown = hv_machine_crash_shutdown;
>  #endif
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> index 1287b0d5962f..f3130f762784 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c
> @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ void machine_halt(void)
>  	machine_ops.halt();
>  }
> 
> -#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
>  void machine_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	machine_ops.crash_shutdown(regs);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
> index 09e3db7ff990..0b367c1e086d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static void xen_hvm_shutdown(void)
>  	if (kexec_in_progress)
>  		xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_soft_reset);
>  }
> +#endif
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
>  static void xen_hvm_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -156,7 +157,6 @@ static void xen_hvm_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs
> *regs)
>  	xen_reboot(SHUTDOWN_soft_reset);
>  }
>  #endif
> -#endif
> 
>  static int xen_cpu_up_prepare_hvm(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> @@ -238,10 +238,10 @@ static void __init xen_hvm_guest_init(void)
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
>  	machine_ops.shutdown = xen_hvm_shutdown;
> +#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
>  	machine_ops.crash_shutdown = xen_hvm_crash_shutdown;
>  #endif
> -#endif
>  }
> 
>  static __init int xen_parse_nopv(char *arg)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists