[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48f3c65f-4e27-42d8-b32a-3889329303c2@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:13:45 -0800
From: William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
David Regan <dregan@...adcom.com>
Cc: dregan@...l.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
computersforpeace@...il.com, kdasu.kdev@...il.com,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joel.peshkin@...adcom.com,
tomer.yacoby@...adcom.com, dan.beygelman@...adcom.com,
anand.gore@...adcom.com, kursad.oney@...adcom.com,
florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, rafal@...ecki.pl,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, andre.przywara@....com,
baruch@...s.co.il, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
dan.carpenter@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: Add support for getting
ecc setting from strap
Hi Miquel,
On 1/24/24 09:32, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>> @@ -2622,19 +2667,43 @@ static int brcmnand_setup_dev(struct brcmnand_host *host)
>> nanddev_get_memorg(&chip->base);
>> struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = host->ctrl;
>> struct brcmnand_cfg *cfg = &host->hwcfg;
>> - char msg[128];
>> + struct device_node *np = nand_get_flash_node(chip);
>> u32 offs, tmp, oob_sector;
>> - int ret;
>> + int ret, sector_size_1k = 0;
>> + bool use_strap = false;
>> + char msg[128];
>>
>> memset(cfg, 0, sizeof(*cfg));
>> + use_strap = of_property_read_bool(np, "brcm,nand-ecc-use-strap");
>>
>> - ret = of_property_read_u32(nand_get_flash_node(chip),
>> - "brcm,nand-oob-sector-size",
>> + /*
>> + * Set ECC size and strength based on hw configuration from strap
>> + * if device tree does not specify them and use strap property is set
>> + * If ecc strength is set in dts, don't use strap setting.
>> + */
>
> You would have to use the strap settings only if the property is set.
> If not property is set, the default from the core should apply I guess.
>
Maybe the comment confuse you... I will make it more clear. But the
logic here is exactly what you said. If no properties are set, the core
value is already set in chip->ecc.strength and chip->ecc.size and it
clear the use_strap flag too.
>> + if (chip->ecc.strength)
>> + use_strap = 0;
>> +
>> + if (use_strap) {
>> + chip->ecc.strength = brcmnand_get_ecc_strength(host);
>> + sector_size_1k = brcmnand_get_sector_size_1k(host);
>> + if (chip->ecc.size == 0) {
>> + if (sector_size_1k < 0)
>> + chip->ecc.size = 512;
>> + else
>> + chip->ecc.size = 512 << sector_size_1k;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "brcm,nand-oob-sector-size",
>> &oob_sector);
>> if (ret) {
>> - /* Use detected size */
>> - cfg->spare_area_size = mtd->oobsize /
>> - (mtd->writesize >> FC_SHIFT);
>> + if (use_strap)
>> + cfg->spare_area_size = brcmnand_get_spare_size(host);
>> + else
>> + /* Use detected size */
>> + cfg->spare_area_size = mtd->oobsize /
>> + (mtd->writesize >> FC_SHIFT);
>> } else {
>> cfg->spare_area_size = oob_sector;
>> }
>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4212 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists