linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/8] Documentation: Create a new folder for all timer internals

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:52:38 +0100
From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker
 <frederic@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, John Stultz
 <jstultz@...gle.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Clemens Ladisch
 <clemens@...isch.de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] Documentation: Create a new folder for all timer
 internals

Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> writes:

> Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de> writes:
>> 4. Add a warning banner at the existing documentation and prepare
>>    everything to get the timer documentation to the proper place and
>>    create a place for timer documentation below the current structure.
>>
>> The benefit of 4. for me is, that there is this warning banner at the
>> top. So this suggests the reader, that this has to be revisited before
>> relying on it for 100%. This banner might also remind the original
>> author/technically deep involved developer that this should be
>> updated.
>
> The best thing, of course, is to just fix all of the documentation and
> make it perfect now :)
>
> Failing that, the banners are fine IMO.  They mark possibly obsolete
> docs, warning readers, and also just might, in an optimal world, inspire
> somebody else to work to improve the situation.

I hope the world is optimal at least sometimes :)

> I've thought for a while that we should have a standard warning or two
> along these lines, like Wikipedia does, but of course haven't done
> anything about it.
>

Sure, if we could standardize it, I would definitely prefere it! For me
as a not sphinx/rst/... expert, it would be great if only something like

. might_be_outdated:: <optional additional text>

needs to be added to the code. And then the default lines would appear
together with the optional additional text.

Is this what you have been thinking about?

Thanks,

	Anna-Maria