[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240125185821.GDZbKvTW93APAiY1LP@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:58:21 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@....com>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yazen.ghannam@....com,
avadnaik@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Update mce_record tracepoint
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:48:55PM -0600, Avadhut Naik wrote:
> This patchset updates the mce_record tracepoint so that the recently added
> fields of struct mce are exported through it to userspace.
>
> The first patch adds PPIN (Protected Processor Inventory Number) field to
> the tracepoint.
>
> The second patch adds the microcode field (Microcode Revision) to the
> tracepoint.
This is a lot of static information to add to *every* MCE.
And where does it end? Stick full dmesg in the tracepoint too?
What is the real-life use case here?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists