linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 24/28] riscv: select config for shadow stack and landing pad instr support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZbK198Vovbw2CwrR@debug.ba.rivosinc.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:26:47 -0800
From: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, broonie@...nel.org, Szabolcs.Nagy@....com,
	kito.cheng@...ive.com, keescook@...omium.org,
	ajones@...tanamicro.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
	palmer@...belt.com, conor.dooley@...rochip.com, cleger@...osinc.com,
	atishp@...shpatra.org, alex@...ti.fr, bjorn@...osinc.com,
	alexghiti@...osinc.com, corbet@....net, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
	oleg@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, shuah@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
	guoren@...nel.org, samitolvanen@...gle.com, evan@...osinc.com,
	xiao.w.wang@...el.com, apatel@...tanamicro.com,
	mchitale@...tanamicro.com, waylingii@...il.com,
	greentime.hu@...ive.com, heiko@...ech.de, jszhang@...nel.org,
	shikemeng@...weicloud.com, david@...hat.com, charlie@...osinc.com,
	panqinglin2020@...as.ac.cn, willy@...radead.org,
	vincent.chen@...ive.com, andy.chiu@...ive.com, gerg@...nel.org,
	jeeheng.sia@...rfivetech.com, mason.huo@...rfivetech.com,
	ancientmodern4@...il.com, mathis.salmen@...sal.de,
	cuiyunhui@...edance.com, bhe@...hat.com, chenjiahao16@...wei.com,
	ruscur@...sell.cc, bgray@...ux.ibm.com, alx@...nel.org,
	baruch@...s.co.il, zhangqing@...ngson.cn, catalin.marinas@....com,
	revest@...omium.org, josh@...htriplett.org, joey.gouly@....com,
	shr@...kernel.io, omosnace@...hat.com, ojeda@...nel.org,
	jhubbard@...dia.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 24/28] riscv: select config for shadow stack and
 landing pad instr support

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 06:44:48PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:12:16AM -0800, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 06:04:26PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:21:49PM -0800, debug@...osinc.com wrote:
>> > > From: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
>> > >
>> > > This patch selects config shadow stack support and landing pad instr
>> > > support. Shadow stack support and landing instr support is hidden behind
>> > > `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI`. Selecting `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI` wires up path
>> > > to enumerate CPU support and if cpu support exists, kernel will support
>> > > cpu assisted user mode cfi.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
>> > > ---
>> > >  arch/riscv/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> > >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> > > index 9d386e9edc45..437b2f9abf3e 100644
>> > > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>> > > @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ config RISCV
>> > >  	select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
>> > >  	select THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
>> > >  	select TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
>> > > +	select RISCV_USER_CFI
>> >
>> > This select makes no sense to me, it will unconditionally enable
>> > RISCV_USER_CFI. I don't think that that is your intent, since you have a
>> > detailed option below that allows the user to turn it on or off.
>> >
>> > If you remove it, the commit message will need to change too FYI.
>> >
>>
>> Selecting this config puts support in Kernel so that it can run tasks who wants
>> to enable hardware assisted control flow integrity for themselves. But apps still
>> always need to optin using `prctls`. Those prctls are stubs and return EINVAL when
>> this config is not selected. Not selecting this config means, kernel will not support
>> enabling this feature for user mode.
>
>I don't think you understand me. "select RISCV_USER_CFI" will
>unconditionally build it into the kernel, making stubs etc useless.
>You're talking like (and the rest of your commit implements it!) that
>this feature can be enabled in menuconfig etc. Having this select
>will always enable the config option, rendering the choice below
>redundant. Try turning it off in menuconfig.

Aah got it now. Thanks.
I'll fix this messaging and select in next version.

>
>Oh and if it were valid to have here, you put it in out of order. That's
>an alphanumerically sorted list :)

Thanks for pointing that out. Will fix it.
>
>Cheers,
>Conor.
>