[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZbHtAobfttD2frwo@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:09:22 -0800
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: "zhangzekun (A)" <zhangzekun11@...wei.com>
CC: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"jean-philippe@...aro.org" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>, Alistair Popple
<apopple@...dia.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Add nents_per_pgtable in
struct io_pgtable_cfg
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 02:20:14PM +0800, zhangzekun (A) wrote:
> Also, it seems to me that SVA use cases and, say, DMA API cases are
> somewhat different where we may be willing to wait longer for DMA API.
> Hmm, the lockup that my patch fixed was for an SVA case that
> doesn't seem to involve DMA API:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20230901203904.4073-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com/
>
> And the other lockup fix for a non-SVA case from Zhang doesn't
> seem to involve DMA API either:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/e74ea905-d107-4202-97ca-c2c509e7aa1e@huawei.com/
>
>
> Hi, Nicolin
>
> These patches do involve DMA APIs, because it modifies arm_smmu_tlb_inv_walk() which will be called when unmapping dma address space.
>
> iommu_dma_unmap_page
> __iommu_dma_unmap
> __iommu_unmap
> arm_smmu_unmap_pages
> arm_lpae_unmap_pages
> io_pgtable_tlb_flush_walk
> arm_smmu_tlb_inv_walk
>
Oh, thanks for clarifying. I was just looking at your trace log
there, but overlooked other places.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists