[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77903574-696b-90f9-f136-be5c5d219ba1@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:19:31 +0530
From: "Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)" <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"Stephen
Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof
Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ajit Pandey
<quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
"Jagadeesh Kona" <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8150: Add gcc_parents_0_ao support
On 1/23/2024 11:17 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 1/23/24 17:34, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
>> Add active_only support for gcc_parents_0, this is needed because
>> some of the clocks under it are critical which would vote on xo
>> blocking the suspend.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>
> Is there a need to keep gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src around? Do we do any
> ratesetting on it? Should we ever turn it off?
>
The branch clocks under gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src are critical clocks, which
are running at 19.2Mhz causing vote on XO during suspend. As of now no
rate setting is happening but this rcg is useful to get the exact rates
from debugfs. Hence this change is needed to avoid XO shutdown issues.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists