[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d46abc40-5ad8-4d09-a6f8-f53c4b338142@apertussolutions.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 19:01:46 -0500
From: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com>
To: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>,
Kanth Ghatraju <kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com>, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: make locality handling resilient
On 1/17/24 03:44, Alexander Steffen wrote:
> On 15.01.2024 02:15, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>> Commit 933bfc5ad213 introduced the use of a locality counter to
>> control when
>> locality request was actually sent to the TPM. This locality counter
>> created a
>> hard enforcement that the TPM had no active locality at the time of
>> the driver
>> initialization. The reality is that this may not always be the case
>> coupled
>> with the fact that the commit indiscriminately decremented the counter
>> created
>> the condition for integer underflow of the counter. The underflow was
>> triggered
>> by the first pair of request/relinquish calls made in
>> tpm_tis_init_core and all
>> subsequent calls to request/relinquished calls would have the counter
>> flipping
>> between the underflow value and 0. The result is that it appeared all
>> calls to
>> request/relinquish were successful, but they were not. The end result
>> is that
>> the locality that was active when the driver loaded would always
>> remain active,
>> to include after the driver shutdown. This creates a significant issue
>> when
>> using Intel TXT and Locality 2 is active at boot. After the GETSEC[SEXIT]
>> instruction is called, the PCH will close access to Locality 2 MMIO
>> address
>> space, leaving the TPM locked in Locality 2 with no means to
>> relinquish the
>> locality until system reset.
>>
>> The commit seeks to address this situation through three changes.
>
> Could you split this up into multiple patches then, so that they can be
> discussed separately?
Gladly, but individually none of these fully address the situation.
>> The first is
>> to walk the localities during initialization and close any open
>> localities to
>> ensure the TPM is in the assumed state. Next is to put guards around the
>> counter and the requested locality to ensure they remain within valid
>> values.
>> The last change is to make the request locality functions be
>> consistent in
>> their return values. The functions will either return the locality
>> requested if
>> successful or a negative error code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>
>> Reported-by: Kanth Ghatraju <kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com>
>> Fixes: 933bfc5ad213 ("tpm, tpm: Implement usage counter for locality")
>> ---
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
>> include/linux/tpm.h | 2 ++
>> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>> index 42b1062e33cd..e7293f85335a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int tpm_request_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> return rc;
>>
>> chip->locality = rc;
>> - return 0;
>> + return chip->locality;
>> }
>>
>> static void tpm_relinquish_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> index 1b350412d8a6..c8b9b0b199dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> @@ -180,7 +180,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_relinquish_locality(struct
>> tpm_chip *chip, int l)
>> struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
>>
>> mutex_lock(&priv->locality_count_mutex);
>> - priv->locality_count--;
>> + if (priv->locality_count > 0)
>> + priv->locality_count--;
>> if (priv->locality_count == 0)
>> __tpm_tis_relinquish_locality(priv, l);
>> mutex_unlock(&priv->locality_count_mutex);
>> @@ -226,18 +227,21 @@ static int __tpm_tis_request_locality(struct
>> tpm_chip *chip, int l)
>> tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
>> } while (time_before(jiffies, stop));
>> }
>> - return -1;
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> }
>>
>> static int tpm_tis_request_locality(struct tpm_chip *chip, int l)
>> {
>> struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
>> - int ret = 0;
>> + int ret = -EIO;
>> +
>> + if (l > TPM_MAX_LOCALITY)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&priv->locality_count_mutex);
>> if (priv->locality_count == 0)
>> ret = __tpm_tis_request_locality(chip, l);
>> - if (!ret)
>> + if (ret >= 0)
>> priv->locality_count++;
>> mutex_unlock(&priv->locality_count_mutex);
>> return ret;
>
> This line seems to be the most important change, that fixes the
> locality_count handling for localities != 0. It could already be
> sufficient to fix your original problem. I'm not sure all the other
> changes are really necessary.
It do not believe this fully address the issue. It does stop the
underflow but locality still is not being properly tracked.
>> @@ -1108,7 +1112,7 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct
>> tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
>> u32 intmask;
>> u32 clkrun_val;
>> u8 rid;
>> - int rc, probe;
>> + int rc, probe, locality;
>> struct tpm_chip *chip;
>>
>> chip = tpmm_chip_alloc(dev, &tpm_tis);
>> @@ -1169,6 +1173,12 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev,
>> struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
>> goto out_err;
>> }
>>
>> + /* It is not safe to assume localities are closed on startup */
>> + for (locality = 0; locality <= TPM_MAX_LOCALITY; locality++) {
>> + if (check_locality(chip, locality))
>> + tpm_tis_relinquish_locality(chip, locality);
>> + }
>> +
>> /* Take control of the TPM's interrupt hardware and shut it
>> off */
>> rc = tpm_tis_read32(priv, TPM_INT_ENABLE(priv->locality),
>> &intmask);
>> if (rc < 0)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h
>> index 4ee9d13749ad..f2651281f02e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/tpm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h
>> @@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ struct tpm_chip_seqops {
>> const struct seq_operations *seqops;
>> };
>>
>> +#define TPM_MAX_LOCALITY 4
>> +
>> struct tpm_chip {
>> struct device dev;
>> struct device devs;
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists