[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc68112f-3863-4f82-b708-7787a4895a88@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:39:15 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Allow VDD_GFX supply to
GX
On 24/01/2024 22:21, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 07:31:34AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 24/01/2024 05:25, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> +# Allow either power-domains or vdd-gfx-supply, not both
>>> +oneOf:
>>> + - required:
>>> + - power-domains
>>> + - required:
>>> + - vdd-gfx-supply
>>> + - not:
>>> + anyOf:
>>> + - required:
>>> + - power-domains
>>> + - required:
>>> + - vdd-gfx-supply
>>
>> I don't fully understand what you want to achieve here. If only "allow
>> either", so not a "require either", then simpler:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230118163208.GA117919-robh@kernel.org/
>>
>
> As discussed in v2, power-domains is currently an optional property in
> this binding and I'm adding vdd-gfx-supply as an alternative to that.
>
Then go with Rob's syntax - not:required: Much easier code.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists