[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f34f6aa-99fa-4545-b706-a1d50864f9e9@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:18:07 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: debug@...osinc.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Szabolcs.Nagy@....com, kito.cheng@...ive.com, keescook@...omium.org,
ajones@...tanamicro.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
conor.dooley@...rochip.com, cleger@...osinc.com, atishp@...shpatra.org,
alex@...ti.fr, bjorn@...osinc.com, alexghiti@...osinc.com
Cc: corbet@....net, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, oleg@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
shuah@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org, guoren@...nel.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, evan@...osinc.com, xiao.w.wang@...el.com,
apatel@...tanamicro.com, mchitale@...tanamicro.com, waylingii@...il.com,
greentime.hu@...ive.com, heiko@...ech.de, jszhang@...nel.org,
shikemeng@...weicloud.com, charlie@...osinc.com, panqinglin2020@...as.ac.cn,
willy@...radead.org, vincent.chen@...ive.com, andy.chiu@...ive.com,
gerg@...nel.org, jeeheng.sia@...rfivetech.com, mason.huo@...rfivetech.com,
ancientmodern4@...il.com, mathis.salmen@...sal.de, cuiyunhui@...edance.com,
bhe@...hat.com, chenjiahao16@...wei.com, ruscur@...sell.cc,
bgray@...ux.ibm.com, alx@...nel.org, baruch@...s.co.il,
zhangqing@...ngson.cn, catalin.marinas@....com, revest@...omium.org,
josh@...htriplett.org, joey.gouly@....com, shr@...kernel.io,
omosnace@...hat.com, ojeda@...nel.org, jhubbard@...dia.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 09/28] mm: abstract shadow stack vma behind
`arch_is_shadow_stack`
On 25.01.24 07:21, debug@...osinc.com wrote:
> From: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
>
> x86 has used VM_SHADOW_STACK (alias to VM_HIGH_ARCH_5) to encode shadow
> stack VMA. VM_SHADOW_STACK is thus not possible on 32bit. Some arches may
> need a way to encode shadow stack on 32bit and 64bit both and they may
> encode this information differently in VMAs.
>
> This patch changes checks of VM_SHADOW_STACK flag in generic code to call
> to a function `arch_is_shadow_stack` which will return true if arch
> supports shadow stack and vma is shadow stack else stub returns false.
>
> There was a suggestion to name it as `vma_is_shadow_stack`. I preferred to
> keep `arch` prefix in there because it's each arch specific.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> mm/gup.c | 5 +++--
> mm/internal.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index dfe0e8118669..15c70fc677a3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -352,6 +352,10 @@ extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp);
> * for more details on the guard size.
> */
> # define VM_SHADOW_STACK VM_HIGH_ARCH_5
> +static inline bool arch_is_shadow_stack(vm_flags_t vm_flags)
> +{
> + return (vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK);
> +}
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
> @@ -362,10 +366,22 @@ extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp);
> * with VM_SHARED.
> */
> #define VM_SHADOW_STACK VM_WRITE
> +
> +static inline bool arch_is_shadow_stack(vm_flags_t vm_flags)
> +{
> + return ((vm_flags & (VM_WRITE | VM_READ | VM_EXEC)) == VM_WRITE);
> +}
> +
Please no such hacks just to work around the 32bit vmflags limitation.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists