linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mt7530: support OF-based registration of switch MDIO bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:22:34 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Cc: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
	Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
	DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>, mithat.guner@...ont.com,
	erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com,
	Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mt7530: support OF-based registration
 of switch MDIO bus

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 08:34:31AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> Currently the MDIO bus of the switches the MT7530 DSA subdriver controls
> can only be registered as non-OF-based. Bring support for registering the
> bus OF-based.
> 
> The subdrivers that control switches [with MDIO bus] probed on OF must
> follow this logic to support all cases properly:
> 
> No switch MDIO bus defined: Populate ds->user_mii_bus, register the MDIO
> bus, set the interrupts for PHYs if "interrupt-controller" is defined at
> the switch node. This case should only be covered for the switches which
> their dt-bindings documentation didn't document the MDIO bus from the
> start. This is to keep supporting the device trees that do not describe the
> MDIO bus on the device tree but the MDIO bus is being used nonetheless.
> 
> Switch MDIO bus defined: Don't populate ds->user_mii_bus, register the MDIO
> bus, set the interrupts for PHYs if ["interrupt-controller" is defined at
> the switch node and "interrupts" is defined at the PHY nodes under the
> switch MDIO bus node].
> 
> Switch MDIO bus defined but explicitly disabled: If the device tree says
> status = "disabled" for the MDIO bus, we shouldn't need an MDIO bus at all.
> Instead, just exit as early as possible and do not call any MDIO API.
> 
> The use of ds->user_mii_bus is inappropriate when the MDIO bus of the
> switch is described on the device tree [1], which is why we don't populate
> ds->user_mii_bus in that case.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231213120656.x46fyad6ls7sqyzv@skbuf/ [1]
> Suggested-by: David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>
> Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>