linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/15] tick/nohz: Remove duplicate between lowres and highres handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ede5kbc6.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:32:09 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, LKML
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peng Liu <liupeng17@...ovo.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
 Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Joel Fernandes
 <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] tick/nohz: Remove duplicate between lowres and
 highres handlers

On Wed, Jan 24 2024 at 18:04, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> +/*
> + * We rearm the timer until we get disabled by the idle code.
> + * Called with interrupts disabled.
> + */
> +static enum hrtimer_restart tick_nohz_highres_handler(struct hrtimer *timer)

Isn't that a misnomer now?

> +{
> +	struct tick_sched *ts =
> +		container_of(timer, struct tick_sched, sched_timer);

Let it stick out please.

> +	struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
> +	ktime_t now = ktime_get();
> +	if (likely(tick_nohz_highres_handler(&ts->sched_timer) == HRTIMER_RESTART))
>  		tick_program_event(hrtimer_get_expires(&ts->sched_timer), 1);

Thanks,

        tglx