linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] gpiolib: add gpio_device_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2baf1f8c0b3d116da55d75621929ad186b33afd7.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:34:02 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
	 <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
  linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 stable@...r.kernel.org,  kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gpiolib: add gpio_device_get_label() stub for
 !GPIOLIB

On Do, 2024-01-25 at 10:28 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:14 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On 25/01/2024 10:04, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 9:16 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > > <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Add empty stub of gpio_device_get_label() when GPIOLIB is not enabled.
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > > > Fixes: d1f7728259ef ("gpiolib: provide gpio_device_get_label()")
> > > > Suggested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> > > > 
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> > > > 
> > > > Reset framework will need it:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401250958.YksQmnWj-lkp@intel.com/
> > > 
> > > And I suppose you'll want an immutable branch for that?
> > 
> > I guess that's the question to Philipp, but other way could be an Ack.
> > 
> 
> I prefer it to go through my tree in case of conflicts as I have a big
> refactor coming up. I'll give it a day or two on the list and set up a
> tag for Philipp.

Works for me, thank you.

regards
Philipp