[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240125-flsplit-v2-25-7485322b62c7@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 05:43:06 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>, David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
gfs2@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 25/41] filelock: convert locks_wake_up_blocks to take a
file_lock_core pointer
Have locks_wake_up_blocks take a file_lock_core pointer, and fix up the
callers to pass one in.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
---
fs/locks.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 6182f5c5e7b4..03985cfb7eff 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static void locks_insert_block(struct file_lock_core *blocker,
*
* Must be called with the inode->flc_lock held!
*/
-static void locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock *blocker)
+static void locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock_core *blocker)
{
/*
* Avoid taking global lock if list is empty. This is safe since new
@@ -815,11 +815,11 @@ static void locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock *blocker)
* fl_blocked_requests list does not require the flc_lock, so we must
* recheck list_empty() after acquiring the blocked_lock_lock.
*/
- if (list_empty(&blocker->fl_core.flc_blocked_requests))
+ if (list_empty(&blocker->flc_blocked_requests))
return;
spin_lock(&blocked_lock_lock);
- __locks_wake_up_blocks(&blocker->fl_core);
+ __locks_wake_up_blocks(blocker);
spin_unlock(&blocked_lock_lock);
}
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ locks_unlink_lock_ctx(struct file_lock *fl)
{
locks_delete_global_locks(&fl->fl_core);
list_del_init(&fl->fl_core.flc_list);
- locks_wake_up_blocks(fl);
+ locks_wake_up_blocks(&fl->fl_core);
}
static void
@@ -1328,11 +1328,11 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,
locks_insert_lock_ctx(left, &fl->fl_core.flc_list);
}
right->fl_start = request->fl_end + 1;
- locks_wake_up_blocks(right);
+ locks_wake_up_blocks(&right->fl_core);
}
if (left) {
left->fl_end = request->fl_start - 1;
- locks_wake_up_blocks(left);
+ locks_wake_up_blocks(&left->fl_core);
}
out:
spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
@@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ int lease_modify(struct file_lock *fl, int arg, struct list_head *dispose)
if (error)
return error;
lease_clear_pending(fl, arg);
- locks_wake_up_blocks(fl);
+ locks_wake_up_blocks(&fl->fl_core);
if (arg == F_UNLCK) {
struct file *filp = fl->fl_core.flc_file;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists