[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DU0PR04MB9417004E7A877D306DD561A1887A2@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:07:15 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>, "rafael@...nel.org"
<rafael@...nel.org>, "daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC: "rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] thermal/drivers/qoriq: fix getting tmu range
Hi Daniel,
> Subject: [PATCH] thermal/drivers/qoriq: fix getting tmu range
>
Would you pick up this patch?
Thanks,
Peng.
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> TMU Version 1 has 4 TTRCRs, while TMU Version >=2 has 16 TTRCRs.
> So limit the len to 4 will report "invalid range data" for i.MX93.
>
> This patch drop the local array with allocated ttrcr array and able to support
> larger tmu ranges.
>
> Fixes: f12d60c81fce ("thermal/drivers/qoriq: Support version 2.1")
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index ccc2eea7f9f5..404f01cca4da
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,9 @@
> #define REGS_TTRnCR(n) (0xf10 + 4 * (n)) /* Temperature Range n
> * Control Register
> */
> +#define NUM_TTRCR_V1 4
> +#define NUM_TTRCR_MAX 16
> +
> #define REGS_IPBRR(n) (0xbf8 + 4 * (n)) /* IP Block Revision
> * Register n
> */
> @@ -71,6 +74,7 @@ struct qoriq_sensor {
>
> struct qoriq_tmu_data {
> int ver;
> + u32 ttrcr[NUM_TTRCR_MAX];
> struct regmap *regmap;
> struct clk *clk;
> struct qoriq_sensor sensor[SITES_MAX];
> @@ -182,17 +186,17 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct device *dev,
> struct qoriq_tmu_data *data)
> {
> int i, val, len;
> - u32 range[4];
> const u32 *calibration;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>
> len = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "fsl,tmu-range");
> - if (len < 0 || len > 4) {
> + if (len < 0 || (data->ver == TMU_VER1 && len > NUM_TTRCR_V1) ||
> + (data->ver > TMU_VER1 && len > NUM_TTRCR_MAX)) {
> dev_err(dev, "invalid range data.\n");
> return len;
> }
>
> - val = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "fsl,tmu-range", range, len);
> + val = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "fsl,tmu-range", data->ttrcr,
> +len);
> if (val != 0) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to read range data.\n");
> return val;
> @@ -200,7 +204,7 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct device *dev,
>
> /* Init temperature range registers */
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> - regmap_write(data->regmap, REGS_TTRnCR(i), range[i]);
> + regmap_write(data->regmap, REGS_TTRnCR(i), data->ttrcr[i]);
>
> calibration = of_get_property(np, "fsl,tmu-calibration", &len);
> if (calibration == NULL || len % 8) {
> --
> 2.37.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists