linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-main: Add CPSW2G and CPSW9G nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0db57065-b48a-4c63-8ad3-45af2924a3cb@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:33:45 +0530
From: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
To: Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@...com>
CC: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Greg
 Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Tero
 Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Nishanth
 Menon <nm@...com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <srk@...com>,
        <r-gunasekaran@...com>, <danishanwar@...com>, <s-vadapalli@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-main: Add CPSW2G and
 CPSW9G nodes

Hello Chintan,

On 25/01/24 15:34, Chintan Vankar wrote:
> From: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
> 

..

>  
> +	main_cpsw0: ethernet@...0000 {
> +		compatible = "ti,j784s4-cpswxg-nuss";
> +		reg = <0x00 0xc000000 0x00 0x200000>;
> +		reg-names = "cpsw_nuss";
> +		#address-cells = <2>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +		ranges = <0x00 0x00 0x00 0xc000000 0x00 0x200000>;
> +		dma-coherent;
> +		clocks = <&k3_clks 64 0>;
> +		clock-names = "fck";
> +		power-domains = <&k3_pds 64 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> +
> +		dmas = <&main_udmap 0xca00>,
> +		       <&main_udmap 0xca01>,
> +		       <&main_udmap 0xca02>,
> +		       <&main_udmap 0xca03>,
> +		       <&main_udmap 0xca04>,
> +		       <&main_udmap 0xca05>,
> +		       <&main_udmap 0xca06>,
> +		       <&main_udmap 0xca07>,
> +		       <&main_udmap 0x4a00>;
> +		dma-names = "tx0", "tx1", "tx2", "tx3",
> +			    "tx4", "tx5", "tx6", "tx7",
> +			    "rx";
> +
> +		status = "disabled";
> +
> +		ethernet-ports {
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +			main_cpsw0_port1: port@1 {
> +				reg = <1>;
> +				label = "port1";
> +				ti,mac-only;
> +				status = "disabled";
> +			};
> +
> +			main_cpsw0_port2: port@2 {
> +				reg = <2>;
> +				label = "port2";
> +				ti,mac-only;
> +				status = "disabled";
> +			};
> +
> +			main_cpsw0_port3: port@3 {
> +				reg = <3>;
> +				label = "port3";
> +				ti,mac-only;
> +				status = "disabled";
> +			};
> +
> +			main_cpsw0_port4: port@4 {
> +				reg = <4>;
> +				label = "port4";
> +				ti,mac-only;
> +				status = "disabled";
> +			};
> +
> +			main_cpsw0_port5: port@5 {
> +				reg = <5>;
> +				label = "port5";

Please add the "ti,mac-only" property here and in the following 3 nodes as well
to keep it consistent.

> +				status = "disabled";
> +			};
> +
> +			main_cpsw0_port6: port@6 {
> +				reg = <6>;
> +				label = "port6";
> +				status = "disabled";
> +			};
> +
> +			main_cpsw0_port7: port@7 {
> +				reg = <7>;
> +				label = "port7";
> +				status = "disabled";
> +			};
> +
> +			main_cpsw0_port8: port@8 {
> +				reg = <8>;
> +				label = "port8";
> +				status = "disabled";
> +			};
> +		};
> +

..

-- 
Regards,
Siddharth.