linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] Assume polling-delay(-passive) = 0 when absent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:11:14 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, 
 Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Assume polling-delay(-passive) = 0 when absent

As it stands, setting 0 explicitly feels like spam inside the DTs.
This series simplifies it.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
---
Konrad Dybcio (2):
      dt-bindings: thermal-zones: Don't require polling-delay(-passive)
      thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when absent

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-zones.yaml |  2 --
 drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c                                 | 12 ++++++++----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 01af33cc9894b4489fb68fa35c40e9fe85df63dc
change-id: 20240125-topic-thermal-f954cf83fc50

Best regards,
-- 
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>