[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <wo4wcvuhvqsqissocu7nz2urg5yt7mx65s5dxkjxqimgnxv3ax@qsa3lqlfsaxi>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:44:54 +0200
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3, RESEND] x86/trampoline: Bypass compat mode in
trampoline_start64() if not needed
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 01:57:18AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > + /* Paging mode is correct proceed in 64-bit mode */
> > +
> > + LOCK_AND_LOAD_REALMODE_ESP lock_rip=1
> > +
> > + movw $__KERNEL_DS, %dx
> > + movl %edx, %ss
> > + addl $pa_real_mode_base, %esp
> > + movl %edx, %ds
> > + movl %edx, %es
> > + movl %edx, %fs
> > + movl %edx, %gs
> > +
> > + movl $pa_trampoline_pgd, %eax
> > + movq %rax, %cr3
> > +
> > + jmpq *tr_start(%rip)
>
> Still think we should add a far jump here so that we run on a defined
> code segment. It probably doesn't matter since there are likely no
> IRETs before reloading anyways, but it seems cleaner.
I think it is cleaner to switch to IRET here. Does this work for you?
diff --git a/arch/x86/realmode/rm/trampoline_64.S b/arch/x86/realmode/rm/trampoline_64.S
index 608f108cba7d..14d9c7daf90f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/realmode/rm/trampoline_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/realmode/rm/trampoline_64.S
@@ -243,7 +243,9 @@ SYM_CODE_START(trampoline_start64)
movl $pa_trampoline_pgd, %eax
movq %rax, %cr3
- jmpq *tr_start(%rip)
+ pushq $__KERNEL_CS
+ pushq tr_start(%rip)
+ lretq
.L_switch_paging:
/*
* To switch between 4- and 5-level paging modes, it is necessary
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists