[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHUa44EcGnOno8TQ-wPE8Q_ghG8t5J5uRLqnYduAnQXx6oRATg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 16:02:08 +0100
From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To: "gavin.liu" <gavin.liu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] optee: support wq_sleep_timeout
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 6:28 AM gavin.liu <gavin.liu@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> From: Gavin Liu <gavin.liu@...iatek.com>
>
> Add wq_sleep_timeout to support self waking when timeout for secure
> driver usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Liu <gavin.liu@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/tee/optee/notif.c | 9 +++++++--
> drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 2 +-
> drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
I'd like to see the corresponding secure world changes taking
advantage of this ABI change before we take this any further.
Thanks,
Jens
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/notif.c b/drivers/tee/optee/notif.c
> index 05212842b0a5..d5e5c0645609 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/notif.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/notif.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static bool have_key(struct optee *optee, u_int key)
> return false;
> }
>
> -int optee_notif_wait(struct optee *optee, u_int key)
> +int optee_notif_wait(struct optee *optee, u_int key, u32 timeout)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> struct notif_entry *entry;
> @@ -70,7 +70,12 @@ int optee_notif_wait(struct optee *optee, u_int key)
> * Unlock temporarily and wait for completion.
> */
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&optee->notif.lock, flags);
> - wait_for_completion(&entry->c);
> + if (timeout != 0) {
> + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&entry->c, timeout))
> + rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + } else {
> + wait_for_completion(&entry->c);
> + }
> spin_lock_irqsave(&optee->notif.lock, flags);
>
> list_del(&entry->link);
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> index 7a5243c78b55..da990c4016ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ struct optee_call_ctx {
>
> int optee_notif_init(struct optee *optee, u_int max_key);
> void optee_notif_uninit(struct optee *optee);
> -int optee_notif_wait(struct optee *optee, u_int key);
> +int optee_notif_wait(struct optee *optee, u_int key, u32 timeout);
> int optee_notif_send(struct optee *optee, u_int key);
>
> u32 optee_supp_thrd_req(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 func, size_t num_params,
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> index e69bc6380683..14e6246aaf05 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> @@ -130,6 +130,8 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_i2c_transfer(struct tee_context *ctx,
> static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_wq(struct optee *optee,
> struct optee_msg_arg *arg)
> {
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> if (arg->num_params != 1)
> goto bad;
>
> @@ -139,7 +141,8 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_wq(struct optee *optee,
>
> switch (arg->params[0].u.value.a) {
> case OPTEE_RPC_NOTIFICATION_WAIT:
> - if (optee_notif_wait(optee, arg->params[0].u.value.b))
> + rc = optee_notif_wait(optee, arg->params[0].u.value.b, arg->params[0].u.value.c);
> + if (rc)
> goto bad;
> break;
> case OPTEE_RPC_NOTIFICATION_SEND:
> @@ -153,7 +156,10 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_wq(struct optee *optee,
> arg->ret = TEEC_SUCCESS;
> return;
> bad:
> - arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
> + if (rc == -ETIMEDOUT)
> + arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BUSY;
> + else
> + arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
> }
>
> static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_wait(struct optee_msg_arg *arg)
> --
> 2.18.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists