[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240126201433.1830600-1-jan.dakinevich@salutedevices.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 23:14:33 +0300
From: Jan Dakinevich <jan.dakinevich@...utedevices.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <kernel@...utedevices.com>, Jan Dakinevich
<jan.dakinevich@...utedevices.com>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: allow to skip clk_core_req_round_rate_nolock()
Calling of clk_core_req_round_rate_nolock() can be time-consuming in a
case of deep hierarchy with multiple dividers/parents. But if the clock
already has exactly the same rate as desired, there is no need to
determine how it could be rounded.
Signed-off-by: Jan Dakinevich <jan.dakinevich@...utedevices.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 2253c154a824..04f0ddced932 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -2423,6 +2423,12 @@ static int clk_core_set_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
if (!core)
return 0;
+ /* skip calculation of rounded rate if the clock already has exactly
+ * the same rate as desired
+ */
+ if (req_rate == clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core))
+ return 0;
+
rate = clk_core_req_round_rate_nolock(core, req_rate);
/* bail early if nothing to do */
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists