linux-kernel - [PATCH 11/15] x86/irq: Extend checks for pending vectors to posted interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:42:33 -0800
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	X86 Kernel <x86@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Lu Baolu" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@...el.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
	maz@...nel.org,
	seanjc@...gle.com,
	"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@....com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/15] x86/irq: Extend checks for pending vectors to posted interrupts

During interrupt affinity change, it is possible to have interrupts delivered
to the old CPU after the affinity has changed to the new one. To prevent lost
interrupts, local APIC IRR is checked on the old CPU. Similar checks must be
done for posted MSIs given the same reason.

Consider the following scenario:
	Device		system agent		iommu		memory 		CPU/LAPIC
1	FEEX_XXXX
2			Interrupt request
3						Fetch IRTE	->
4						->Atomic Swap PID.PIR(vec)
						Push to Global Observable(GO)
5						if (ON*)
	i						done;*
						else
6							send a notification ->

* ON: outstanding notification, 1 will suppress new notifications

If the affinity change happens between 3 and 5 in IOMMU, the old CPU's posted
interrupt request (PIR) could have pending bit set for the vector being moved.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
index e9d8e554765c..6661fefdd49a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <asm/mpspec.h>
 #include <asm/msr.h>
 #include <asm/hardirq.h>
+#include <asm/posted_intr.h>
 
 #define ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3	1
 
@@ -500,7 +501,7 @@ static inline bool is_vector_pending(unsigned int vector)
 	if (irr  & (1 << (vector % 32)))
 		return true;
 
-	return false;
+	return pi_pending_this_cpu(vector);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.25.1