linux-kernel - [PATCH 13/15] iommu/vt-d: Add an irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240126234237.547278-14-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:42:35 -0800
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	X86 Kernel <x86@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Lu Baolu" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@...el.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
	maz@...nel.org,
	seanjc@...gle.com,
	"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@....com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/15] iommu/vt-d: Add an irq_chip for posted MSIs

Introduce a new irq_chip for posted MSIs, the key difference is in
irq_ack where EOI is performed by the notification handler.

When posted MSI is enabled, MSI domain/chip hierarchy will look like
this example:

domain:  IR-PCI-MSIX-0000:50:00.0-12
 hwirq:   0x29
 chip:    IR-PCI-MSIX-0000:50:00.0
  flags:   0x430
             IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE
             IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE
 parent:
    domain:  INTEL-IR-10-13
     hwirq:   0x2d0000
     chip:    INTEL-IR-POST
      flags:   0x0
     parent:
        domain:  VECTOR
         hwirq:   0x77
         chip:    APIC

Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
index 566297bc87dd..fa719936b44e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
@@ -1233,6 +1233,52 @@ static struct irq_chip intel_ir_chip = {
 	.irq_set_vcpu_affinity	= intel_ir_set_vcpu_affinity,
 };
 
+static void dummy(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+}
+
+/*
+ * With posted MSIs, all vectors are multiplexed into a single notification
+ * vector. Devices MSIs are then dispatched in a demux loop where
+ * EOIs can be coalesced as well.
+ *
+ * "INTEL-IR-POST" IRQ chip does not do EOI on ACK, thus the dummy irq_ack()
+ * function. Instead EOI is performed by the posted interrupt notification
+ * handler.
+ *
+ * For the example below, 3 MSIs are coalesced into one CPU notification. Only
+ * one apic_eoi() is needed.
+ *
+ * __sysvec_posted_msi_notification()
+ *	irq_enter();
+ *		handle_edge_irq()
+ *			irq_chip_ack_parent()
+ *				dummy(); // No EOI
+ *			handle_irq_event()
+ *				driver_handler()
+ *	irq_enter();
+ *		handle_edge_irq()
+ *			irq_chip_ack_parent()
+ *				dummy(); // No EOI
+ *			handle_irq_event()
+ *				driver_handler()
+ *	irq_enter();
+ *		handle_edge_irq()
+ *			irq_chip_ack_parent()
+ *				dummy(); // No EOI
+ *			handle_irq_event()
+ *				driver_handler()
+ *	apic_eoi()
+ * irq_exit()
+ */
+static struct irq_chip intel_ir_chip_post_msi = {
+	.name			= "INTEL-IR-POST",
+	.irq_ack		= dummy,
+	.irq_set_affinity	= intel_ir_set_affinity,
+	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= intel_ir_compose_msi_msg,
+	.irq_set_vcpu_affinity	= intel_ir_set_vcpu_affinity,
+};
+
 static void fill_msi_msg(struct msi_msg *msg, u32 index, u32 subhandle)
 {
 	memset(msg, 0, sizeof(*msg));
-- 
2.25.1