[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240126093257.b6059a4c4fa1b1d345132350@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:32:57 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/6] tracing: Add snapshot refcount
Hi Vincent,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:53:40 +0000
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -1470,12 +1483,20 @@ register_snapshot_trigger(char *glob,
> > > struct event_trigger_data *data,
> > > struct trace_event_file *file)
> > > {
> > > - if (tracing_alloc_snapshot_instance(file->tr) != 0)
> > > + if (tracing_arm_snapshot(file->tr))
> > > return 0;
> >
> > BTW, is this return value correct? It seems that the register_*_trigger()
> > will return error code when it fails.
>
> It should indeed be
>
> ret = tracing_arm_snapshot()
> if (ret)
> return ret;
OK, then there is a bug. We need to fix it before changing this
for backporting.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists