linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] mfd: cs42l43: Tidy up header includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:06:05 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>, broonie@...nel.org,
	patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] mfd: cs42l43: Tidy up header includes

On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 3:55 PM Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, Charles Keepax wrote:
> >
> > > Use more forward declarations, move header guards to cover other
> > > includes, and rely less on including headers through other headers.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> >
> > Patches look okay to me, but seeing as Andy suggested the changes, it
> > would be good to get a R-by from him.
> 
> I'm worried now only about missing a commit message in one patch and
> (with less severity) the v2 of this one which appears not to be
> necessary (i.e. v1 is fully okay). If you consider the commit message
> absence is okay, feel free to apply v2, otherwise with that addressed
> v3 can go in my opinion.

Please fix-up and submit a v4 with Andy's R-bs.

> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]