[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZbOFw7m7CX8SHy4F@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:13:23 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, jonas.gorski@...il.com,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: BCM63XX: Fix missing prototypes
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 09:46:54AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Most of the symbols for which we do not have a prototype can actually be
> made static and for the few that cannot, there is already a declaration
> in a header for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/bcm63xx/boards/board_bcm963xx.c | 2 +-
> arch/mips/bcm63xx/dev-rng.c | 2 +-
> arch/mips/bcm63xx/dev-uart.c | 1 +
> arch/mips/bcm63xx/dev-wdt.c | 2 +-
> arch/mips/bcm63xx/irq.c | 2 +-
> arch/mips/bcm63xx/setup.c | 2 +-
> arch/mips/bcm63xx/timer.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
applied to mips-fixes.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists